Emery M J Art Therapy as an Intervention for Autism Journal of American Art Therapy Association
Br Med Bull. 2021 Apr 21 : ldab005.
Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review
Dexing Zhang
JC School of Public Wellness and Master Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Thomas Jing Mindfulness Centre for Enquiry and Training, The Chinese Academy of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Mainland china
Eric Grand P Lee
JC School of Public Health and Principal Care, The Chinese Academy of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Thomas Jing Mindfulness Centre for Enquiry and Preparation, The Chinese Academy of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Eva C W Mak
JC Schoolhouse of Public Health and Master Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Thomas Jing Mindfulness Center for Research and Training, The Chinese Academy of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
C Y Ho
JC School of Public Health and Master Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Thomas Jing Mindfulness Center for Enquiry and Grooming, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Prc
Samuel Y S Wong
JC School of Public Wellness and Primary Intendance, The Chinese Academy of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Thomas Jing Mindfulness Centre for Enquiry and Training, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Received 2020 Aug sixteen; Revised 2020 Dec 27; Accustomed 2021 February 2.
Abstract
Introduction
This is an overall review on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs).
Sources of information
We identified studies in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, Web of Scientific discipline and Google Scholar using keywords including 'mindfulness', 'meditation', and 'review', 'meta-analysis' or their variations.
Areas of agreement
MBIs are effective for improving many biopsychosocial conditions, including depression, anxiety, stress, insomnia, addiction, psychosis, pain, hypertension, weight control, cancer-related symptoms and prosocial behaviours. It is found to be beneficial in the healthcare settings, in schools and workplace but further enquiry is warranted to await into its efficacy on different problems. MBIs are relatively safe, but ethical aspects should be considered. Mechanisms are suggested in both empirical and neurophysiological findings. Price-effectiveness is found in treating some health weather condition.
Areas of controversy
Inconclusive or only preliminary evidence on the effects of MBIs on PTSD, ADHD, ASD, eating disorders, loneliness and physical symptoms of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and respiratory conditions. Furthermore, some beneficial effects are not confirmed in subgroup populations. Cost-effectiveness is still to ostend for many health conditions and populations.
Growing points
Many mindfulness systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate depression quality of included studies, hence loftier-quality studies with adequate sample size and longer follow-up period are needed.
Areas timely for developing research
More than research is needed on online mindfulness trainings and interventions to ameliorate biopsychosocial health during the COVID-nineteen pandemic; Deeper agreement of the mechanisms of MBIs integrating both empirical and neurophysiological findings; Long-term compliance and effects of MBIs; and development of mindfulness plus (mindfulness+) or personalized mindfulness programs to elevate the effectiveness for different purposes.
Keywords: mindfulness-based interventions, biopsychosocial health, safety, ethics, compliance, mechanisms
Mindfulness and mindfulness-based interventions
Mindfulness is a moment-by-moment sensation of thoughts, feelings, bodily sensations and surrounding environment. Being mindful is related to be open, nonjudgmental, friendly, curious, accepting, empathetic and kind.1 Mindfulness practices aim to cultivate mindfulness state. These practices tin can be formal (e.thousand. breathing, sitting, walking, body scan) or informal (e.thousand. mindfulness in everyday life). Many mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) programmes have been established. Among all the MBIs, mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), which was launched by Jon Kabat-Zinn in 1979,two and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) by Segal, Teasdale and Williams based on MBSR,three,4 are the two most widely adopted MBIs. These two programmes include eight weekly mindfulness sessions with i-twenty-four hour period retreat.
Mindfulness is rooted in Buddhist traditions. However, it has go popular in recent years among diverse secular populations in healthcare, educational and workplace settings: from pre-school children to older adults across the world. Publications on mindfulness have increased dramatically in the recent decade. The publications on mindfulness is starting to be more comparable to publications on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), which is ane of the well-nigh widely used psychotherapies (Fig. one).
Comparison on number of publications: mindfulness vs. CBT trials (by August 2020) [Note: Search terms included ('mindful* or meditate*' AND 'trial or random or random* command* trial*'); ('cerebral behavioural therapy or cognitive behavioural therapy or CBT' AND 'trial or random or random* control* trial*') in Title; Databases included MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO.]
Methods used for identifying relevant evidence
Literature in English language was searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, AMED, Spider web of Scientific discipline and Google Scholar using keywords including 'mindfulness', 'meditation' and 'review', 'meta-analysis' or their variations, with no restrictions on the twelvemonth of publication. The search was conducted in July 2020. In choosing testify, these full general principals were applied: (i) published in more recent years if similar reviews were identified; (two) included randomized controlled trials or meta-analysis in the review; (iii) presented with more conclusive conclusions. Literature with other types of written report design (eastward.yard. randomized controlled trials, cohorts, cantankerous-sectional studies) were also manually searched and included when no systematic review was found or when considered as appropriate. However, while it was intent to include all important literature in a certain area, the review might not exhaust all relevant literature but had but selected key references of interest that we idea to exist most pertinent and insightful for a specific topic.
Effects on mental health
MBIs have been shown to be efficacious in improving some of the common mental health problems.5
Depression and anxiety
For depression and anxiety, the efficacy of MBIs is sufficiently confirmed with meta-analyses demonstrating moderate to strong effect sizes for the reduction of the two conditions.vi–8 The effects were also applicative during pregnancy, where a systematic review showed that MBIs helped reducing perinatal feet of moderate to large magnitude; however, the effects were less consistent in terms of reducing perinatal depression.ix The trending web-based interventions on mindfulness take also shown effectiveness in reducing low and anxiety amidst people diagnosed with anxiety disorders too.10 It was unclear, however, whether the benefits of mindfulness practices every bit a stand-lone intervention nonetheless exist, every bit it is difficult to dismantle the effects from social interaction and psychoeducation, which are the other components integrated in many MBIs (east.g. group MBCT), from standalone mindfulness practices. Therefore, a recent meta-analyses11 of eighteen eligible studies investigated the gap, and has demonstrated that fifty-fifty mindfulness exercise itself (eastward.g. breathing infinite, torso scan, sitting meditation, soundscan) had small to medium effects on both feet (SMD = 0.39; CI: 0.22, 0.56; PI: 0.07, 0.70; P < .001, I 2 = eighteen.90%) and depression (SMD = 0.41; CI: 0.xix, 0.64; PI: −0.05, 0.88; P < .001; I ii = 33.43%).
Stress
Current prove overall supports a moderate effect of MBIs on reducing stress; however, more robust studies are needed to make clear conclusions among unlike populations. A meta-analysis of five randomized control trials tested the effects of MBIs on cortisol levels, a stress-mediated hormone, and found that in that location may exist a beneficial issue in good for you adult populations.12 Notwithstanding, the overall issue size was moderately low (grand = 0.41; P = 0.025).12 On the other hand, some other meta-analysis indicated that there was a significant, medium effect of meditation interventions on cortisol levels, simply the effect was merely present for at-risk samples such as those living in stressful life situations.13 There are also studies done amidst specific populations such as third instruction students14 and older adults,15 showing inconclusive results. Amongst tertiary education students, the issue sizes of interventions for stress were moderate (g = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.27–0.57), just nigh studies were of poor quality.14 Amid older adults, no clear bear witness was found that MBIs can reduce the perception of stress.15
Insomnia
The current evidence on the furnishings of MBIs on insomnia and sleep disturbance is promising. A meta-analysis concluded that MBIs are constructive in improving symptoms of indisposition and sleep quality when compared to attention/didactics and waitlist command with medium to big furnishings (g = 0.67, 95% conviction interval [CI] = 0.30–1.05) and that the effects seem to endured at iii months postintervention (grand = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.48–one.64).16 Several other meta-analyses likewise found like results, which all showed pregnant comeback in insomnia or sleep quality as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Alphabetize.17–19
Eating disorders
Current studies provided preliminary evidence on the potential effects of MBIs on eating disorders (EDs). One systematic review and meta-analysis showed a within-condition effect of MBIs on ED symptoms, emotional eating, negative affect and body dissatisfaction, and on the body mass alphabetize (BMI) in anorectic and bulimic participants relative to pre-assessment.xx Another systematic review and meta-assay also institute that MBIs may help reducing body image business and negative affect, while promoting trunk appreciation.21 Both authors concluded that more rigorous studies are needed before the efficacy of MBIs on EDs can be confirmed.20,21
Habit
Literature supports the efficacy of MBIs in both substance and behavioural addictions. A systematic review of 54 randomised controlled trials plant that MBIs were successful in the reduction of dependence, craving and other symptoms related to addiction, and the improvement of mood state and emotion dysregulation.22 Two other meta-analytic results likewise revealed significant small-to-large effects of MBIs in reducing levels of perceived peckish,23,24 severity of stress,23,24 frequency and severity of substance misuse,23 anxiety and depressive symptoms,24 negative affectivity,24 and mail-traumatic symptoms24 for the treatment of substance misuse. Although the effectiveness is promising, more research is needed especially on longer follow-up assessments and among diverse populations.
Psychosis
It seems that MBIs have potential benefits for people with psychosis, only further enquiry is warranted.25 A systematic review and meta-analysis on 434 patients constitute brusk-term moderate bear witness of MBIs on full psychotic symptoms, positive symptoms, hospitalization rates, duration of hospitalization, and mindfulness as short-term effects and total psychotic symptoms and duration of hospitalization as long-term effects in patients with psychosis.26 Another systematic review as well confirmed that MBIs are viable for individuals with psychosis and information technology could provide a number of meaning benefits over routine care such as improving negative symptoms and measures of functioning.27 Future large trials adopting randomization process are suggested to gain greater insight into the mechanisms and long-term effectiveness of MBIs among people with psychosis.
Post-traumatic stress disorder
MBIs among post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-diagnosed participants were less conclusive. A systematic review and meta-analysis of ten trials on meditation interventions accept shown that the effects for PTSD were positive but not statistically pregnant.28 The variety of meditation intervention types, the brusque follow-upward times and the quality of studies limited the analyses.28 Other systematic reviews reported similar findings, where they reported MBIs such as mindfulness, yoga and relaxation studies maybe useful for the mind–body treatments for PTSD but many of the trials suffered from methodologic weaknesses or were of depression to moderate methodological rigor.29,thirty Further high-quality studies are needed on MBIs among PTSD-diagnosed participants in gild to increase conviction in its effectiveness.
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
There is a need for farther research before determining the effectiveness of MBIs on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) despite electric current studies showed that it tin can be a promising intervention. A systematic review and meta-assay has found statistically meaning effect of MBIs in decreasing the severity of ADHD core symptoms such as inattention, hyperactivity or impulsivity (children/adolescents: Hedge's grand = −0.44, 95% CI −0.69 to −0.19, I 2 0%; adults: Hedge's g = −0.66, 95% CI –i.21 to −0.eleven, I ii 81.81%).31 Yet, the authors ended that in that location is insufficient methodologically sound evidence to back up the effectiveness due to limited number of studies, heterogeneity across studies and high take chances of bias.31 Like results and conclusions were also noted in several other systematic reviews.32–34
Autism spectrum disorders
Current literature on MBIs for people with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or their carers is very limited. A systematic review done in 2017 analysed sixteen eligible studies but definitive recommendations could not exist made on the furnishings of MBIs for people with ASD or their carers.35 This was because those studies included very diverse historic period groups and upshot measures, including behavioural, social and psychological symptoms, too every bit the subjective well-being of children and adults with ASD and their parents.35 Overall, there may be some potential benefits of MBIs among people with ASD, these include: reducing anxiety,35,36 idea problems,35,36 rumination,35 aggression,36 parental stress37, and increasing subjective well-being38 too as parental psychological wellbeing.37
Cognition
The current available evidence to support MBIs on cognition is weak. A systematic review conducted in older adults with balmy cognitive impairment plant that MBIs improved participant'due south cognitive role and everyday activities operation.39 However, the available studies had small sample sizes, lack of control comparing and lack of follow-up to sympathise the effects on preventing progression of dementia.39 Further loftier-quality trials and on dissimilar populations are required to confirm the effectiveness of the benefits of MBIs on cognitive office.
Effects on physical health
MBIs can provide positive effects on physical health and evidence is strong regarding benefits of MBIs on the psychological symptoms among people with chronic diseases.
Pain
The testify of benefits of MBIs on pain is abundant among different populations.forty,41 A systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 RCTs on chronic pain conducted in 2017 showed improvement on chronic hurting management after mindfulness meditation intervention.twoscore The percent change of the hateful in hurting for intervention subjects was −0.19% (SD, 0.91; min, −0.48; max, 0.10), which was significantly higher than the control groups (−0.08% (SD, 0.74; min, −0.35; max, 0.11)).40 A network meta-analysis found MBSR is effective for chronic pain, and the effects are not significantly different betwixt MBSR and CBT; though more studies are needed to ostend this.41 Furthermore, for the effects of cursory MBIs with a full contact time of less than ane.five hours, current evidence is inadequate to confirm the effectiveness on acute and chronic pain.42
Hypertension and cardiovascular diseases
A few systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggested that MBIs can reduce blood pressure level (BP).43–45 A systematic review and meta-analysis of five studies on MBSR showed reduction on systolic and diastolic blood pressure level in people with hypertension or elevated blood pressure. Notwithstanding, nearly of the studies were related to clinical claret pressure only and evidence on ambulatory blood force per unit area is needed.43 A systematic review amidst people with non-communicable diseases found systolic BP was reduced later the viii-week MBSR (−vi.xc mmHg [95% CI: −10.82, −2.97]), followed by the 12-calendar week breathing awareness meditation (−4.10 mmHg [95% CI: −7.54, −0.66]), and eight-calendar week mindfulness-based intervention (−two.69 mmHg [95% CI: −three.90, −1.49]) and diastolic BP was reduced after eight-week MBSR (−ii.45 mmHg [95% CI: −3.74, −1.17]) and the eight-week MBI (−2.24 mmHg [95% CI: −iii.22, −ane.26]).44 Another systematic review among patients with CVD in 2020 showed benefits on systolic BP (d + = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.26, 1.51) and psychological symptoms (d +s = 0.49–0.64), but non diastolic BP.45 Another systematic review by Zou evaluated the effect of mindful exercises for patients after stroke showed significantly improvement on the sensorimotor function on lower limb (SDM = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.43–one.fifteen; I two = 62.67%) and upper limb (SDM = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.39–one.01; I two = 32.36%).46 Further studies can assess gait speed, leg strength, aerobic endurance, motor part, cognitive function and gait parameters.
Weight control and obesity
Overweight and obesity are a meaning health risk factor leading to tremendous disease burden due to the associated comorbidities.47 Mindful eating is an effective intervention for weight command, especially among people with rampage eating or emotional eating tendency. Mindful eating might have longer-term effects when comparing to conventional diet programmes, which involves limiting energy intake and restricting nutrient choices, because mindful eating tends to be more sustainable and also deal with emotional problems that may influence unhealthy diet.48–52 A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2019 evaluated ten mindful eating and weight control studies, and institute significant weight reduction after mindful eating program when compared with control groups (−0.348 kg, 95% CI: −0.591 to −0.105).53 Furthermore, effects of MBIs were equal to conventional diet programmes.53 Yet, limitations were institute in the studies, such as short duration and biased samples (unbalanced sex ratio, source and place of living). Hence, farther studies with longer elapsing and modifications of bailiwick selection could be benign to evaluate long-term improvement among different populations.
Diabetes
The current evidence to support the effect of MBIs on the physiological outcomes of diabetes is inconclusive. One systematic review found mixed results on the effectiveness of MBIs for physiological outcomes (glycaemic control and blood pressure) on both types one and 2 diabetes patients.54 Another systematic review and meta-analysis found that meditative movements significantly improved the glycaemic control including fasting blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and postprandial blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.55 Withal, the authors noted information technology is difficult to conclude the extent to which MBIs are constructive because of the small sample size, brusk duration and diverse delivery methods inside the published studies.55 Apart from glycaemic control, systematic reviews also establish comeback in psychological symptoms such as anxiety,54 distress symptoms,54,56 depression54,57 and quality of life.57 Further enquiry addressing the limitations is necessary to gauge the efficacy of MBIs for diabetes.
Cancer
There may be some benefits of MBIs on the concrete health outcomes in cancer patients especially on cancer-related fatigue and pain, besides psychological benefits.58,59 A systematic review and meta-assay found that MBIs led to a statistically significant reduction in cancer-related fatigue (CRF) score among cancer patients (SMD = -0.51, 95%CI [−0.81–0.20]),59 particularly among lung cancer patients.60 Apart from CRF, a range of other outcomes such as improvements in sleep disturbances, pain and other psychological symptoms including feet, depression, fear of cancer recurrence were also found in another systematic review and meta-analysis.61 Overall, although MBIs appeared effective in reducing CRF and other symptoms, farther loftier-quality studies are still required to provide additional insights and to confirm the existing evidence.
Respiratory wellness (COPD, asthma, etc.)
The effectiveness of MBIs on respiratory health remained unclear. A systematic review and meta-assay of 16 studies constitute that meditative movement may take the potential to enhance lung office and physical activity in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.62 When compared to nonexercised group, the intervention enhanced the half dozen-minute walking altitude (iii months: mean deviation [MD] = 25.40 one thousand, 95% CI: 16.25–34.54; 6 months: MD = 35.75 m, 95% CI: 22.23–49.27), likewise every bit functions on forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (3 months: Md = 0.1 50, 95% CI: 0.02–0.18; 6 months: MD = 0.18 Fifty, 95% CI: 0.1–0.26).62 Yet, taking into considerations of the limitations of the studies such as small sample sizes, inconsistency in study quality and the various style of meditative movement in studies, the authors noted that further trials are needed to substantiate the findings.62 Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on COPD65 and asthma63 besides concluded that further high-quality trials are needed to ostend the effectiveness of MBIs on respiratory health.63,64
Effects on social health and prosocial behaviours
There is evidence supporting furnishings of MBIs on social health and prosocial behaviours (i.east. voluntary behaviour intended to benefit another).65,66 A systematic review found medium effects on prosocial behaviours for both correlational and intervention studies, and the furnishings are similar to known and unknown others.65 The results suggest that mindfulness fosters ethical and cooperative behaviour across a range of interpersonal contexts and may reduce intergroup biases.65 Another recent review with 29 studies also find like results with small to medium effect sizes, suggesting MBIs reliably better compassionate helping and reduces prejudice and retaliation.66 Furthermore, MBIs can effectively reduce anger,67 violence68 and aggression.69 Information technology as well may help improve social and ecological sustainability, past improving individuals' subjective well-being and benign connection with others, the society and the nature.70
Loneliness and social isolation are an increasing public health business organisation, especially during COVID-19 and for older adults. Some preliminary studies indicated that mindfulness training might accept positive result in mitigating loneliness.71–74 A preliminary written report showed MBSR effectively reduced loneliness in older adults.71 Some other report found positive outcome on mitigating the loneliness of women with HIV.72 A study among Chinese college students found a positive relationship between mindfulness and loneliness reduction.73 Lindsay et al. raised that mindfulness both reduced loneliness and increased social interactions in daily life compared with an active control plan, in the experiment of smartphone-based mindfulness training.74
Mindfulness in unlike settings
Mindfulness amidst professionals in healthcare settings
Mindfulness has been adopted equally a stress direction tool for healthcare professionals, with a medium upshot size was found (r = 0.342, CI = 0.202–0.468).75 Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown the promising furnishings on the other psychological indicators amid healthcare professionals and students, e.chiliad. reducing depression and burnout and improving emotional resilience.76,77 However, both benefits and challenges (time limitations and feasibility) were perceived at the same fourth dimension,78 and at that place are insufficient studies on indirect outcomes of MBIs among healthcare professionals, e.g. how it may influence professional person-patient communication, relationship and patient outcomes.
Mindfulness in schools
Mindfulness programmes in schools are increasingly popular. Many dissimilar school mindfulness programmes (e.thou. '.b', mindful schools, well and resilience programme) have been implemented across the world.79,80 These programmes can target at students, teachers, and even parents or caregivers.81 Contempo systematic reviews found MBIs hold promises in detail in improving resilience to stress, cerebral performance such as attention, and emotional problems in children and youths.82,83 The reviews showed a meaning result for resilience in regards to well-existence, positive and constructive emotions or affect, social skills and positive relationships, self-concept and self-esteem. The effects (upshot size = 0.36–0.fourscore) are comparable or improve than the furnishings (overall effect size = 0.xxx) of schoolhouse-based social and emotional learning programs as revealed in the meta-analysis.84 It is promising in applying MBIs as a life skill within pre-, elementary, centre or high schools. Students might be benefited from xc-min mindfulness do per week (i.due east. 18 minutes on average per twenty-four hour period).85 In building up mindful schools, a whole school approach is valuable to integrate mindfulness through the curriculum, professional development of teachers, leadership exercise and across the learning environment.86
Mindfulness in workplace
A systematic review on 58 592 adults from nonclinical samples showed that trait mindfulness was positively associated with confidence, chore satisfaction, functioning and interpersonal relations, and negatively associated with burnout and work withdrawal.87 A recent systematic review on 56 randomized controlled trials shows that MBIs are beneficial to employees in reducing stress, burnout, mental distress and somatic complaints, while improving mindfulness, well-being, pity and chore satisfaction—all with small to large effect sizes ranging from Hedge's g = 0.32–0.77, just effects on work engagement and productivity were express past low number of studies.88
Price-effectiveness of MBIs
MBIs are likely to be toll-effective and value for coin as it tin can be provided in grouping format or as cocky-assistance interventions,89 and it tin also be integrated into educational programmes for clinicians, educationalists and other professionals to directly and indirectly benefit themselves, students, their clients and people around them.ninety While the benefits are almost equal to cognitive behavioural interventions, mindfulness may crave less professional grooming and take less time for both workers and clients to main, and they are probably less expensive to provide.91 For instance, studies showed that the grooming toll for teachers in a mindfulness training plan ranged from U.s.a.$515 to Usa$1850 per instructor depending on the number of teachers being trained and the ancillary and opportunity costs.92 Even so, more studies are needed to confirm their price-effectiveness. Preliminary evidence back up its toll-effectiveness,93 including just not limited to pain in chest cancer,94 fibromyalgia,95 low back pain96 and caregiver training.97 It is also a price-saving treatment for improving quality of life for distressed cancer patients using both online or face-to-face MBCT.98 Even so, uncertainties existed in workplace,99 and nonetheless it needs cost-effectiveness studies on many other health problems aswell.
Compliance of MBIs
Not-compliance is a barrier to learning mindfulness100 and enquiry shows that the drib-out rate can reach 25% or higher.101,102 Inconsistent findings were shown in previous studies regarding who might or might not comply with MBIs. Although in full general, women, those with higher openness to feel, higher resistance to change and severer symptoms showed college levels of compliance.103,104 The relationship between participants' compliance and intervention outcomes is inconsistent, ranging from no correlation to a positive correlation,105 although 1 recent systematic review based on 28 studies constitute a modest but significant clan between participants' cocky-reported home do and intervention outcomes (r = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.19–0.34).106 In terms of factors associated with amend compliance, a skillful natural setting is establish to be important, specially for beginners.100 And some researchers suggested to place meditation exercises that tin can residual optimizing effectiveness and enhancing adherence to strengthen the compliance to MBIs.107 It still needs more research to understand who might comply with and benefit from which blazon of MBIs the nigh, and to expect into factors and strategies enhancing compliance.
Mechanisms of MBIs
Studies suggested that the mechanisms of MBIs include changes in mindfulness, rumination, worry, self-regulation, compassion or meta-awareness, which predicted or mediated the handling effects, which are theoretically predicted mechanisms of MBIs.108–111 Preliminary results as well suggested alterations in attention, memory specificity, self-discrepancy, emotional reactivity and momentary positive and negative affect, can be part of the mechanisms.108 Recently, the mindfulness-to-pregnant (MMT) approach has as well been recognized equally providing a theoretical framework to investigate specific mindfulness components and their contributions to the positive health outcomes.112,113 In this approach, the iterative cycle of appraisal, decentering and metacognition would lead to positive reappraisals of broader contexts that extinguish negative bear on and promote positive effects and eudaimonic significant in life.112,113 Yet, there are withal many unknowns regarding the mechanisms ofMBIs.
Neurophysiological findings
The changes on brain and biomarkers of immune function and stress might have provided neurophysiological ground for explaining the positive effects of MBIs. Systematic reviews have consistently constitute effects of MBIs on brain activity that involves in processing cocky-relevant information, self-regulation, focused problem-solving, adaptive behaviour and interoception, among both healthy populations and patient groups.114–119 Eight brain regions fundamental to meta-sensation (frontopolar cortex), torso awareness (sensory cortices and insular), memory consolidation and reconsolidation (hippocampus), cocky and emotion regulation (anterior and mid cingulate; orbitofrontal cortex), and intra- and interhemispheric communication (superior longitudinal fasciculus; corpus callosum) consistently altered with a medium effect size after mindfulness practices.118 In expert meditators, both functional and structural encephalon modifications accept been induced, especially in areas involved in self-referential processes such as cocky-awareness and self-regulation, though not plenty evidence suggests structural brain modifications in short-term meditators.114 Amid people with major depressive disorders, MBIs have as well modulatory effects on several encephalon regions (e.g. the prefrontal cortex, the basal ganglia, the anterior and posterior cingulate cortices and the parietal cortex).115 Another systematic review on 78 functional neuroimaging (fMRI and PET) studies of meditation found patterns of encephalon activation and deactivation for common styles of meditation (focused attention, mantra recitation, open monitoring and compassion/loving-kindness), with medium effects for both activations (d = 0.59) and deactivations (d = −0.74), suggesting potential practical significance.116 The systematic review on EEG results suggested that mindfulness is associated with increased alpha and theta power in both healthy populations and patient groups, which may signify a relaxed alertness state contributing to mental health.117
Systematic reviews on RCTs revealed that mindfulness meditation have effects on stress and immune-related physiological markers of inflammation, jail cell-mediated immunity and biological aging: reductions in the action of the cellular transcription factor NF-kB, reductions in circulating levels of C-reactive protein, increases in CD4+ T cell count (in HIV-diagnosed individuals), and increases in telomerase activeness.120 Some other systematic review on RCTs found that, compared to an agile control (relaxation, exercise or didactics), mindfulness meditation reduced physiological markers of stress, such as cortisol, C-reactive poly peptide, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, triglycerides and tumour necrosis factor-alpha, in various populations.121 And a greater number of hours of meditation are associated with a greater impact on telomere biology.122 However, these tentative findings need further replication and the review authors call for studies to include physiological markers as primary outcome of RCTs.120–123
Ethics of MBIs
Ethical questions are fundamental and essential in guiding the future directions of MBIs to utilize the right mindfulness rightly, and also the application of MBIs should not overstate the organizational and social determinants of ill health. In the books of 'Practitioner'southward Guide to Ideals and Mindfulness-Based Interventions' (edited past Lynette Monteiro, Jane Compson and Frank Musten) and 'Handbook of Ethical Foundations of Mindfulness' (edited by Stanley Steven, Ronald Purser and Nirbhay Singh), ethical questions of mindfulness are discussed extensively. Many questions on ethics are yet to be addressed for MBIs. For example, paradox in teaching mindfulness in concern and military machine settings, depriving superiors to make use of subordinates through mindfulness regardless of other organizational factors causing work-related stress or low. On the other hand, at that place are many virtues and strengths in MBIs in providing personally meaningful and prosocial values,124 and MBIs tin improve upstanding standards, that mindfulness promotes greater ethical intentions and lesser ethical infractions, with more mindful people revealed a greater accent on moral principles than those who are less mindful.125
Prophylactic of MBIs
MBIs are regarded equally relatively safe interventions.126 Like many other psychological intervention trials, adverse events and agin furnishings of MBIs are largely underreported. A previous systematic review on condom of MBSR and MBCT indicated that fewer than one in 5 trials had mentioned the monitoring of adverse effects.126 Programme-related factors, participant-related factors, and clinician- or instructor-related factors are potential sources of agin effects.ane,126–132 A safety checklist is notwithstanding needed to be built based on previous studies and empirical experiences. Practitioners and researchers in hereafter MBI programmes are advised to report the potential adverse events using such a checklist, and also continue to accept safety precautions such as screening and caring for vulnerable individuals. These individuals could be those with PTSD, seizure disorder/epilepsy, acute psychosis, mania, suicidality or other health bug of concern.133
Hereafter directions
Despite the increasing trend of mindfulness studies and applications, there are still many areas need exploration. First, college quality of enquiry studies is needed. The most frequent limitations mentioned in the systematic reviews on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MBIs are low quality of study design, small sample size, short follow-upwardly flow, and inconsistent terminology and measurement tools. Futurity more robust studies are needed to address these caveats. 2d, more than studies on online MBIs intervention and training are needed to understand if online alternatives have equal or meliorate furnishings and price-effectiveness, though preliminary benefits are seen.10,134,135 Online alternatives might be important, especially given the pandemic of COVID-19. Third, more than understanding of the mechanisms by integrating both empirical findings and neurophysiological findings. Fourth, more research is needed to explore the acceptance and compliance of MBIs to understand who might benefit more than from MBIs, and barriers and respective strategies (e.thou. better meditation environment) for improving the acceptance and compliance, taken into considerations of safety issues and ethical concerns. And a closer look at the long-term compliance is needed. This may call for large-calibration cohort studies on MBIs. 5th, develop more mindfulness related research and services guidelines and regulations, east.one thousand. on adverse events monitoring and safety guarantee, and qualifications of mindfulness teachers. These might be important when MBIs are provided as a collective action in schools, companies or organizations. Sixth, exploration of Mindfulness Plus (Mindfulness+), i.e. combination of MBIs with other effective interventions (for instance, mindfulness plus medications, mindfulness plus behavioural activation,136 mindfulness plus reflection training137 and mindfulness plus Qigong movement therapy138), or exploration of personalized/individualized mindfulness-based interventions for individuals with different characteristics and needs, selecting from many different mindfulness programs. This would provide more potential to amend the furnishings of MBIs for different goals.
Conclusion
MBIs are effective for many mutual mental, physical and social health conditions among different populations. Beneficial effects of MBIs accept been constitute on depression, feet, stress, insomnia, habit, psychosis, pain, hypertension, weight control, cancer-related symptoms and prosocial behaviours. Current evidence suggested MBIs can be beneficial for healthcare professionals and inside schools and workplaces although more studies are still needed to wait into its efficacy on many dissimilar biopsychosocial health weather. MBIs are relatively safe. Ethical aspects should e'er exist taken into business relationship during mindfulness-based trainings and interventions. Mechanisms of MBIs accept been suggested in both empirical and neurophysiological findings. Cost-effectiveness is constitute for some health bug (e.g. breast cancer, fibromyalgia, low back pain or caregiver training). More than high-quality studies with acceptable sample size and longer follow-upwardly duration are needed to confirm its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in many other problems and among sub-groups. Some other areas needing additional inquiry are suggested in this review.
Contributor Information
Dexing Zhang, JC School of Public Health and Main Intendance, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Thomas Jing Mindfulness Center for Enquiry and Preparation, The Chinese Academy of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Mainland china.
Eric Grand P Lee, JC School of Public Wellness and Chief Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Prc. Thomas Jing Mindfulness Centre for Research and Grooming, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Eva C W Mak, JC Schoolhouse of Public Health and Principal Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Mainland china. Thomas Jing Mindfulness Centre for Research and Training, The Chinese Academy of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
C Y Ho, JC School of Public Wellness and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. Thomas Jing Mindfulness Centre for Research and Training, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Samuel Y S Wong, JC School of Public Wellness and Main Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, Communist china. Thomas Jing Mindfulness Centre for Research and Training, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Disharmonize of interest statement
None.
Data availability statement
There are no new data associated with this article.
References
1. Baer R, Crane C, Miller E et al.Doing no harm in mindfulness-based programs: conceptual problems and empirical findings. Clin Psychol Rev 2019;71:101–14. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Constructivism in the Human being Sciences 2003;viii:73. [Google Scholar]
3. Segal ZV, Teasdale JD, Williams JMG. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy: Theoretical Rationale and Empirical Status. New York: Guilford Press, 2004.
4. Teasdale JD, Segal ZV, Williams JMG et al.Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cerebral therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Aghaie E, Roshan R, Mohamadkhani P et al.Well-being, mental health, full general wellness and quality of life improvement through mindfulness-based interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Islamic republic of iran Cherry Crescent Med J 2018;xx:7. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.16231 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
half-dozen. Khoury B, Sharma M, Rush SE et al.Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-assay. J Psychosom Res 2015;78:519–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.009 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Witt AA et al.The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on feet and depression: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010;78:169–83. doi: x.1037/a0018555 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin 1000 et al.Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2013;33:763–71. doi: x.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
ix. Shi ZR, MacBeth A. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on maternal perinatal mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Mind 2017;8:823–47. doi: 10.1007/s12671-016-0673-y. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Sevilla-Llewellyn-Jones J, Santesteban-Echarri O, Pryor I et al.Spider web-based mindfulness interventions for mental health treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Ment Health 2018;v:16. doi: ten.2196/10278. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
eleven. Blanck P, Perleth S, Heidenreich T et al.Effects of mindfulness exercises as stand-alone intervention on symptoms of feet and depression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther 2018;102:25–35. doi: ten.1016/j.brat.2017.12.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Sanada K, Montero-Marin J, Diez MA et al.Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on salivary cortisol in healthy adults: a meta-analytical review. Front Physiol 2016;7:12. doi: 10.3359/fphys.2016.00/171. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Koncz A, Demetrovics Z, Takacs ZK. Meditation interventions efficiently reduce cortisol levels of at-run a risk samples: a meta-assay. Health Psychol Rev 2020:1–29. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1760727. [PubMed] [CrossRef]
14. Breedvelt JJF, Amanvermez Y, Harrer Thou et al.The furnishings of meditation, yoga, and mindfulness on depression, anxiety, and stress in third teaching students: a meta-analysis. Front end Psych 2019;10:15. doi: ten.3389/fpsyt.2019.00193. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Li SYH, Bressington D. The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on low, anxiety, and stress in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2019;28:635–56. doi: x.1111/inm.12568. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
xvi. Rash JA, Kavanagh VAJ, Garland SN. A meta-analysis of mindfulness-based therapies for insomnia and slumber disturbance moving towards processes of alter. Slumber Med Clin 2019;fourteen:209-+. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2019.01.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Wang YY, Wang F, Zheng W et al.Mindfulness-based interventions for insomnia: a meta-assay of randomized controlled trials. Behav Sleep Med 2020;18:ane–9. doi: x.1080/15402002.2018.1518228. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Gong H, Ni CX, Liu YZ et al.Mindfulness meditation for insomnia: a meta-assay of randomized controlled trials. J Psychosom Res 2016;89:1–vi. doi: ten.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.07.016 [published online first: September 25, 2016]. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
xix. Chen T-L, Chang S-C, Hsieh H-F et al.Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on slumber quality and mental wellness for indisposition patients: a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2020;135:110144. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110144. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Turgon R, Ruffault A, Juneau C et al.Eating disorder treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of mindfulness-based programs. Mind 2019;10:2225–44. doi: ten.1007/s12671-019-01216-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Beccia AL, Dunlap C, Hanes DA, et al.Mindfulness-based eating disorder prevention programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mental Health & Prevention 2018;9:1–12 doi: 10.1016/j.mhp.2017.11.001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Sancho Yard, De Gracia M, Rodriguez RC et al.Mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of substance and Behavioral addictions: a systematic review. Front Psych 2018;9:9. doi: ten.3389/fpsyt.2018.00095. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Li W, Howard MO, Garland EL et al.Mindfulness treatment for substance misuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Subst Abus Treat 2017;75:62–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.01.008. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Cavicchioli Thou, Movalli K, Maffei C. The clinical efficacy of mindfulness-based treatments for alcohol and drugs employ disorders: a meta-analytic review of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. Eur Addict Res 2018;24:137–62. doi: 10.1159/000490762. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Louise S, Fitzpatrick 1000, Strauss C et al.Mindfulness-and acceptance-based interventions for psychosis: our electric current understanding and a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 2018;192:57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Cramer H, Lauche R, Haller H et al.Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for psychosis: a systematic review and meta-assay. Glob Adv Health Med 2016;5:30–43. doi: x.7453/gahmj.2015.083 [published online first: March 5, 2016]. [PMC costless article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Aust J, Bradshaw T. Mindfulness interventions for psychosis: a systematic review of the literature. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2017;24:69–83. doi: ten.1111/jpm.12357. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Hilton L, Maher AR, Colaiaco B et al.Meditation for posttraumatic stress: systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Trauma 2017;9:453–lx. doi: 10.1037/tra0000180. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Niles BL, Mori DL, Polizzi C et al.A systematic review of randomized trials of mind-body interventions for PTSD. J Clin Psychol 2018;74:1485–508. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22634. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Banks K, Newman E, Saleem J. An overview of the inquiry on mindfulness-based interventions for treating symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review. J Clin Psychol 2015;71:935–63. doi: ten.1002/jclp.22200. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Zhang JH, Diaz-Roman A, Cortese S. Meditation-based therapies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-assay. Evid-Based Ment Health 2018;21:87–94. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300015. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Mak C, Whittingham M, Cunnington R et al.Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions for attending and executive function in children and adolescents-a systematic review. Listen 2018;9:59–78. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0770-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Lee CSC, Ma Thousand-T, Ho H-Y et al.The effectiveness of mindfulness-based intervention in attending on individuals with ADHD: a systematic review. Hong Kong J Occup Ther 2017;30:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.hkjot.2017.05.001. [PMC gratuitous commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Poissant H, Mendrek A, Talbot N et al.Behavioral and cerebral impacts of mindfulness-based interventions on adults with attention-arrears hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review. Behav Neurol 2019;2019:xvi. doi: 10.1155/2019/5682050. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Hourston S, Atchley R. Autism and mind-body therapies: a systematic review. J Altern Complement Med 2017;23:331–9. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0336. [PMC costless article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Cachia RL, Anderson A, Moore DW. Mindfulness in individuals with autism Spectrum disorder: a systematic review and narrative analysis. Rev J Autism Dev Disord 2016;3:165–78. doi: 10.1007/s40489-016-0074-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Cachia RL, Anderson A, Moore DW. Mindfulness, stress and well-existence in parents of children with autism Spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2016;25(one):ane–xiv doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0193-eight. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Hartley M, Dorstyn D, Due C. Mindfulness for children and adults with autism Spectrum disorder and their caregivers: a meta-assay. J Autism Dev Disord 2019;49:4306–19. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-04145-three. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Farhang MA-O, Miranda-Castillo C, Rubio M et al.Impact of heed-torso interventions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 2019;31:643–66. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218002302. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Hilton LA-O, Hempel S, Ewing BA et al.Mindfulness meditation for chronic pain: systematic review and meta-assay. Ann Behav Med 2017;51:199–213. doi: ten.1007/s12160-016-9844-2. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Khoo E-L, Small R, Wei C et al.Comparative evaluation of grouping-based mindfulness-based stress reduction and cerebral behavioural therapy for the treatment and direction of chronic pain: a systematic review and network metaanalysis. Evid Based Ment Wellness 2019;22:26–35. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300062. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. McClintock Every bit, McCarrick SM, Garland EL et al.Brief mindfulness-based interventions for astute and chronic pain: a systematic review. J Altern Complement Med 2019;25:265–78. doi: ten.1089/acm.2018.0351. [PMC costless commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Solano Lopez AL. Effectiveness of the mindfulness-based stress reduction plan on blood force per unit area: a systematic review of literature. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs 2018;xv:344–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Intarakamhang U, Macaskill A, Prasittichok P. Mindfulness interventions reduce blood force per unit area in patients with non-catching diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon 2020;half dozen:nine. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03834. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Scott-Sheldon LA, Gathright EC, Donahue ML et al.Mindfulness-based interventions for adults with cardiovascular affliction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med 2020;54:67–73. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Zou LY, Sasaki JE, Zeng Northward et al.A systematic review with meta-assay of mindful exercises on rehabilitative outcomes among poststroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99:2355–64. doi: x.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N et al.The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Wellness 2009;9:88. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Lyzwinski LN, Caffery 50, Bambling M et al.Relationship between mindfulness, weight, and weight-related behaviors in higher students: a systematic review. Alternative & Complementary Therapies 2018;24:202–fourteen. doi: 10.1089/act.2018.29182.lnl. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Carriere One thousand, Khoury B, Gunak MM et al.Mindfulness-based interventions for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2018;nineteen:164–77. doi: 10.1111/obr.12623. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Ruffault A, Czernichow S, Hagger MS et al.The effects of mindfulness training on weight-loss and health-related behaviours in adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Res Clin Pract 2017;11:90–111. doi: ten.1016/j.orcp.2016.09.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Fulwiler C, Brewer JA, Sinnott Southward, et al.Mindfulness-based interventions for weight loss and CVD risk management. Curr Cardiovasc Take chances Rep 2015;9(x):46. doi: 10.1007/s12170-015-0474-one. [PMC complimentary commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Katterman SN, Kleinman BM, Hood MM et al.Mindfulness meditation as an intervention for rampage eating, emotional eating, and weight loss: a systematic review. Consume Behav 2014;15:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.01.005. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Artiles RF, Staub K, Aldakak L et al.Mindful eating and common diet programs lower torso weight similarly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2019;20(11):1619–27. doi: 10.1111/obr.12918. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
54. Noordali F, Cumming J, Thompson JL. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on physiological and psychological complications in adults with diabetes: a systematic review. J Health Psychol 2017;22:965–83. doi: 10.1177/1359105315620293. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Xia TW, Yang Y, Li WH et al.Meditative movements for patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid-based Complement Altern Med 2020;2020:12. doi: x.1155/2020/5745013. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Bogusch LM, O'Brien WH. The effects of mindfulness-based interventions on diabetes-related distress, quality of life, and metabolic command among persons with diabetes: a meta-analytic review. Behav Med 2019;45:19–29. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2018.1432549. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
57. Xunlin NG, Lau Y, Klainin-Yobas P et al.The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions among cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-assay. Back up Care Cancer 2020;28:1563–78. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05219-ix. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Ngamkham S, Holden JE, Smith EL. A systematic review: mindfulness intervention for Cancer-related hurting. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2019;6:161–ix. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_67_18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. He J, Hou JH, Qi J, et al.Mindfulness based stress reduction interventions for cancer related fatigue: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Natl Med Assoc 2020;112(4):387–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.04.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Xie CY, Dong B, Wang LH et al.Mindfulness-based stress reduction can alleviate cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res 2020;130:8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109916. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Cillessen 50, Johannsen M, Speckens AEM et al.Mindfulness-based interventions for psychological and concrete wellness outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychooncology 2019;28(12):2257–69. doi: 10.1002/pon.5214. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Wu LL, Lin ZK, Weng Hard disk et al.Effectiveness of meditative movement on COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2018;13:1239–50. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S159042. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Paudyal P, Jones C, Grindey C et al.Meditation for asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Asthma 2018;55:771–8. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1365887. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Clari Thousand, Conti A, Fontanella R et al.Mindfulness-based programs for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods systematic review. Mind 2020;xx. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01348-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Donald JN, Sahdra BK, Van Zanden B et al.Does your mindfulness benefit others? A systematic review and meta-assay of the link between mindfulness and prosocial behaviour. Br J Psychol 2019;110:101–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. Berry DR, Hoerr JP, Cesko South et al.Does mindfulness training without explicit ideals-based instruction promote prosocial Behaviors? A meta-analysis. Personal Soc Psychol Balderdash 2020;46:1247–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Wright S, Day A, Howells K. Mindfulness and the handling of anger problems. Assailment and Violent Behavior 2009;xiv(five):396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.06.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
68. Gillions A, Cheang R, Duarte R. The outcome of mindfulness practice on assailment and violence levels in adults: a systematic review. Aggress Vehement Behav 2019;48:104–15. doi: x.1016/j.avb.2019.08.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
69. Fix RL, Ready ST. The effects of mindfulness-based treatments for aggression: a disquisitional review. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2013;eighteen(2):219–27. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. Friese M, Messner C, Schaffner Y. Mindfulness meditation counteracts self-control depletion. Witting Cogn 2012;21:1016–22. doi: x.1016/j.concog.2012.01.008 [published online first: February 09, 2012]. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
71. Creswell JD, Irwin MR, Burklund LJ et al.Mindfulness-based stress reduction training reduces loneliness and pro-inflammatory gene expression in older adults: a minor randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun 2012;26(seven):1095–101. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.07.006. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
72. Samhkaniyan E, Mahdavi A, Mohamadpour S, et al.The effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on quality of life and loneliness of women with HIV. J Med Life 2015;8(Spec Iss iv):107–113. [published online first: Jan 1, 2015] [PMC costless commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Zhang N, FM F, Sy H et al.Mindfulness training for loneliness amongst Chinese college students: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Psychol 2018;53:373–eight. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Lindsay EK, Young South, Brown KW et al.Mindfulness training reduces loneliness and increases social contact in a randomized controlled trial. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116:3488–93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813588116 [published online starting time: Feb 28, 2019]. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
75. Burton A, Burgess C, Dean S et al.How effective are mindfulness-based interventions for reducing stress among healthcare professionals? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stress & Health: J Int Soc for the Investigation of Stress 2017;33:three–13. doi: x.1002/smi.2673. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
76. Lomas T, Medina JC, Ivtzan I et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of the touch on of mindfulness-based interventions on the well-being of healthcare professionals. Mind 2019;ten:1193–216. doi: x.1007/s12671-018-1062-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
77. Suleiman-Martos N, Gomez-Urquiza JL, Aguayo-Estremera R et al.The outcome of mindfulness training on exhaustion syndrome in nursing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nursing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc) 2020;76:1124–40. doi: 10.1111/jan.14318. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
78. Scheepers RA, Emke H, Epstein RM et al.The impact of mindfulness-based interventions on doctors' well-being and performance: a systematic review. Med Educ 2020;54:138–49. doi: x.1111/medu.14020. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
79. Bostic JQ, Nevarez MD, Potter MP et al.Being present at school: implementing mindfulness in schools. Kid and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics 2015;24:245–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80. Sapthiang S, Van Gordon W, Shonin East. Health school-based mindfulness interventions for improving mental health: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Periodical of Child and Family Studies 2019;28(10):2650–viii. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01482-w. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
81. Burgdorf Five, Szabo Chiliad, Abbott MJ. The effect of mindfulness interventions for parents on parenting stress and youth psychological outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front end Psychol 2019;ten:1336. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01336. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
82. Zenner C, Herrnleben-Kurz S, Walach H. Mindfulness-based interventions in schools—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 2014;five:603. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Erbe R, Lohrmann D. Mindfulness meditation for boyish stress and well-beingness: a systematic review of the literature with implications for school wellness programs. Health Educ 2015;47(2):12–9. [Google Scholar]
84. Durlak JA, Weissberg RP, Dymnicki AB et al.The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Dev 2011;82:405–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85. Klingbeil DA, Renshaw TL, Willenbrink JB et al.Mindfulness-based interventions with youth: a comprehensive meta-assay of group-design studies. J Sch Psychol 2017;63:77–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87. Mesmer-Magnus J, Manapragada A, Viswesvaran C et al.Trait mindfulness at work: a meta-analysis of the personal and professional person correlates of trait mindfulness. Hum Perform 2017;30:79–98. doi: x.1080/08959285.2017.1307842. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
88. Vonderlin R, Biermann Yard, Bohus M et al.Mindfulness-based programs in the workplace: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Listen 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01328-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
89. Cavanagh Grand, Strauss C, Forder Fifty et al.Can mindfulness and acceptance be learnt by self-help?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of mindfulness and credence-based cocky-assist interventions. Clin Psychol Rev 2014;34:118–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90. Ergas O. The deeper teachings of mindfulness-based "Interventions' equally a reconstruction of "education'. J Philos Educ 2015;49:203–20. doi: ten.1111/1467-9752.12137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
91. Singh SK, Gorey KM. Relative effectiveness of mindfulness and cognitive behavioral interventions for anxiety disorders: meta-analytic review. Soc Work Ment Health 2018;16:238–51. [Google Scholar]
92. Doyle SL, Brown JL, Rasheed D et al.Cost analysis of ingredients for successful implementation of a mindfulness-based professional person evolution program for teachers. Listen 2019;ten:122–xxx. [Google Scholar]
93. Duarte R, Lloyd A, Kotas Eastward et al.Are acceptance and mindfulness-based interventions 'value for money'? Evidence from a systematic literature review. Br J Clin Psychol 2019;58:187–210. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94. Johannsen M, Sørensen J, O'Connor M et al.Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is cost-constructive compared to a wait-listing command for persistent pain in women treated for primary chest cancer—results from a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology 2017;26:2208–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95. Pérez-Aranda A, D'Amico F, Feliu-Soler A et al.Cost–utility of mindfulness-based stress reduction for fibromyalgia versus a multicomponent intervention and usual intendance: a 12-calendar month randomized controlled trial (EUDAIMON study). J Clin Med 2019;eight:1068. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96. Herman PM, Anderson ML, Sherman KJ et al.Price-effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction vs cognitive behavioral therapy or usual care among adults with chronic depression-dorsum pain. Spine 2017;42:1511. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97. Singh NN, Lancioni GE, Karazsia BT et al.Effectiveness of caregiver training in mindfulness-based positive beliefs back up (MBPBS) vs. training-equally-usual (TAU): a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol 2016;7:1549. [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98. Compen F, Adang East, Bisseling Due east et al.Cost-utility of individual internet-based and face-to-face mindfulness-based cognitive therapy compared with handling as usual in reducing psychological distress in cancer patients. Psychooncology 2020;29:294–303. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99. van Dongen JM, van Berkel J, Boot CR et al.Long-term cost-effectiveness and render-on-investment of a mindfulness-based worksite intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Environ Med 2016;58:550–lx. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100. Lymeus F, Lindberg P, Hartig T. A natural meditation setting improves compliance with mindfulness grooming. J Environ Psychol 2019;64:98–106. doi: x.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
101. Abbott RA, Whear R, Rodgers LR et al.Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness based cognitive therapy in vascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. J Psychosom Res 2014;76:341–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.02.012 [published online first: April 22, 2014]. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
102. Lamothe 1000, Rondeau East, Malboeuf-Hurtubise C et al.Outcomes of MBSR or MBSR-based interventions in health care providers: a systematic review with a focus on empathy and emotional competencies. Complement Ther Med 2016;24:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2015.eleven.001 [published online first: Feb 11, 2016]. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
103. Loma CL, Updegraff JA. Mindfulness and its relationship to emotional regulation. Emotion 2012;12:81–90. doi: 10.1037/a0026355 [published online showtime: Dec 14, 2011]. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
104. Mikolasek M, Witt CM, Barth J. Adherence to a mindfulness and relaxation self-care app for Cancer patients: mixed-methods feasibility study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018;6:06. doi: 10.2196/11271. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
105. Vettese LC, Toneatto T, Stea JN, et al.Do mindfulness meditation participants practice their homework? And does it make a difference? A review of the empirical bear witness. Periodical of Cognitive Psychotherapy 2009;23(iii):198–225. doi: x.1891/0889-8391.23.3.198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
106. Parsons CE, Crane C, Parsons LJ et al.Home do in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of participants' mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes. Behav Res Ther 2017;95:29–41. doi: x.1016/j.brat.2017.05.004 [published online first: May 21, 2017]. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
107. Berghoff CR, Wheeless LE, Ritzert TR et al.Mindfulness meditation adherence in a college sample: comparison of a x-min versus 20-min 2-week daily practice. Mind 2017;eight:1513–21. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0717-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
108. van der Velden AM, Kuyken W, Wattar U et al.A systematic review of mechanisms of change in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy in the treatment of recurrent major depressive disorder. Clin Psychol Rev 2015;37:26–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109. Alsubaie G, Abbott R, Dunn B et al.Mechanisms of action in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in people with concrete and/or psychological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 2017;55:74–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110. Hölzel BK, Lazar SW, Gard T et al.How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of activeness from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci 2011;half dozen:537–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111. Leyland A, Rowse 1000, Emerson L-Grand. Experimental effects of mindfulness inductions on cocky-regulation: systematic review and meta-assay. Emotion 2019;19:108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112. McConnell PA, Froeliger B. Mindfulness, mechanisms and meaning: perspectives from the cerebral neuroscience of habit. Psychol Inq 2015;26:349–57. doi: ten.1080/1047840X.2015.1076701 [published online first: March 1, 2016]. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
113. Garland EL, Farb NA, Goldin P et al.Mindfulness broadens awareness and builds eudaimonic meaning: a process model of mindful positive emotion regulation. Psychol Inq 2015;26:293–314. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114. Boccia M, Piccardi L, Guariglia P. The meditative heed: a comprehensive meta-analysis of MRI studies. BioMed Research International 2015;2015:419808 doi: 10.1155/2015/419808. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
115. Vignaud P, Donde C, Sadki T et al.Neural effects of mindfulness-based interventions on patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018;88:98–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
116. Play a trick on KC, Dixon ML, Nijeboer Southward et al.Functional neuroanatomy of meditation: a review and meta-analysis of 78 functional neuroimaging investigations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016;65:208–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117. Lomas T, Ivtzan I, Fu CHY. A systematic review of the neurophysiology of mindfulness on EEG oscillations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015;57:401–10. doi: ten.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.018. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
118. Fox KC, Nijeboer Southward, Dixon ML et al.Is meditation associated with altered brain construction? A systematic review and meta-analysis of morphometric neuroimaging in meditation practitioners. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014;43:48–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119. Marchand WR. Neural mechanisms of mindfulness and meditation: show from neuroimaging studies. World J Radiol 2014;six:471–9. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i7.471. [PMC gratis commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
120. Blackness DS, Slavich GM. Mindfulness meditation and the immune arrangement: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann North Y Acad Sci 2016;1373:13–24. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12998 [published online start: January 23, 2016]. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
121. Pascoe MC, Thompson DR, Jenkins ZM et al.Mindfulness mediates the physiological markers of stress: systematic review and meta-assay. J Psychiatr Res 2017;95:156–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
122. Schutte NS, Malouff JM, Keng SL. Meditation and telomere length: a meta-analysis. Psychol Health 2020;1–15. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1707827. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
123. Heckenberg RA, Eddy P, Kent Southward et al.Practice workplace-based mindfulness meditation programs meliorate physiological indices of stress? A systematic review and meta-assay. J Psychosom Res 2018;114:62–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
124. Baer R. Ideals, values, virtues, and grapheme strengths in mindfulness-based interventions: a psychological science perspective. Mind 2015;half dozen:956–69. [Google Scholar]
125. Ruedy NE, Schweitzer ME. In the moment: the effect of mindfulness on ethical conclusion making. J Bus Ethics 2010;95:73–87. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0796-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
126. Wong SYS, Chan JYC, Zhang DX et al.The safety of mindfulness-based interventions: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Heed 2018;9:1344–57. doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-0897-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
127. Anālayo B. The insight noesis of fear and agin effects of mindfulness practices. Mind 2019;ten:2172–85. [Google Scholar]
128. Anderson T, Suresh M, Farb NA. Meditation benefits and drawbacks: empirical codebook and implications for teaching. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement 2019;3:207–20. [Google Scholar]
129. Britton W. Can mindfulness exist too much of a good matter? The value of a heart way. Current Opinion in Psychology 2019;28:159–65. doi: x.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.011. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
130. Britton WB. Tin mindfulness be also much of a proficient thing? The value of a center manner. Curr Opin Psychol 2019;28:159–65. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
132. Schlosser M, Sparby T, Vörös S et al.Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular meditators: prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations. PLoS 1 2019;14:e0216643. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
133. Lustyk MK, Chawla N, Nolan R et al.Mindfulness meditation research: issues of participant screening, safety procedures, and researcher grooming. Adv Heed Body Med 2009;24:twenty–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
134. Spijkerman 1000, Pots WTM, Bohlmeijer ET. Effectiveness of online mindfulness-based interventions in improving mental health: a review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Psychol Rev 2016;45:102–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
135. Toivonen KI, Zernicke Yard, Carlson LE. Web-based mindfulness interventions for people with concrete health conditions: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2017;xix:17. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7487. [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
136. Wong SY, Dominicus YY, Chan AT et al.Treating subthreshold depression in primary intendance: a randomized controlled trial of behavioral activation with mindfulness. The Annals of Family Medicine 2018;sixteen:111–9. [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
137. Zelazo PD, Forston JL, Masten AS et al.Mindfulness plus reflection training: effects on executive part in early babyhood. Front Psychol 2018;9:208. [PMC complimentary article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
138. Astin JA, Berman BM, Bausell B et al.The efficacy of mindfulness meditation plus qigong motion therapy in the handling of fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol 2003;thirty:2257–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8083197/
0 Response to "Emery M J Art Therapy as an Intervention for Autism Journal of American Art Therapy Association"
Post a Comment